| The design
professionals presence on the site, typically: to review the progress of the job; to
review general compliance of the work with plans and specifications; and to respond to
specific inquiries, creates two potential areas of liability. One such area is the
A/Es failure to detect deviations from the plans and specifications. The second area
is the failure to detect unsafe conditions that cause injury to a third-party. Safety
- Construction observers are generally not responsible for injuries to
third-parties resulting from the contractors operations. Under certain circumstances
they can be liable for the failure to direct the correction of unsafe conditions.
To minimize your potential liability:
- Specifically disavow any right to control the work, stop the job, supervise or
coordinate subcontractors, direct the contractors means, methods, techniques,
sequences or procedures of construction, and safety precautions and programs.
- Go to the job site with a specific purpose, not just to wander around.
- Dont attend meetings that do not impact on your scope of services - i.e. do
not attend safety meetings.
- Visit only those portions of the site at which work you must observe is taking
place.
- Issue a memorandum of your comments regarding the quality of the work.
- Avoid preprinted "inspection" forms that may have a reference to
safety.
The Design Professionals Dilemma - Ignore an Unsafe Condition or Report it.
- The courts of most jurisdictions generally do not hold a design professional
liable for construction site injuries that relate to the contractors operations
merely because the design professional made periodic visits to the site, ABSENT CONDUCT
WHICH EVIDENCES THE ASSUMPTION OF SAFETY RELATED DUTIES.
- Frequently, however, courts will find that a design professional bears at least
some responsibility for a construction phase injury because his conduct at the site is
inconsistent with the position that he has no duties with regard to safety.
- Many courts have also held that, as a professional, an architect or engineer
cannot ignore an unsafe condition of which he has knowledge and which poses a risk to
third-parties.
- The best compromise is to advise the owner or construction superintendent of an
observed unsafe condition in writing. The writing should not address the manner of
correction. The writing should emphasize that the A/E does not have, and is not
undertaking any duties with regard to safety or safety inspections. Rather, in the course
of his visit to the site to check on the progress of the work and the compliance of the
work with the plans, a particular condition was observed.
As a project manager you may have more responsibilities for safety. The owner
may want you to affirmatively monitor the contractors safety programs and/or conduct
loss control surveys. This should be avoided. If the owner desires such services, they
should be contracted for separately, directly by the owner, with a Safety Engineer. If
some additional involvement with safety is required, the services should be limited to the
following:
- Requiring contractors to submit safety programs - do not review them for
adequacy.
- Requiring contractors to conduct "tool box" meetings.
- Report any conditions, actually observed and actually known to be unsafe, to the
general contractors superintendent.
Your review of the work for compliance with the plans and specifications should
be limited to:
- GENERAL compliance
- With plans and specifications prepared BY YOU and with YOUR design concept.
- To determine if the work WHEN COMPLETED will be in accordance with the plans and
specifications.
- Avoid language which obligates you to assure compliance with the
"requirements of the contract of construction" since these typically include
references to safety.
- Avoid definitions in the contract documents which include temporary structures as
Work.
|