Bulletproof:
Limitation of Liability in Design Professional Contracts
By: Steven G.M. Stein, Esq. & Robert J. Harris, Esq.
Introduction
In the last few years, as a result of the decline in the commercial real estate market and
the economy in general, architects and engineers with an instinct for survival have sought
ways in which to reduce costs and share liability risks of a project with the owner. One
contractual approach to reduce liability is for the design professional to negotiate with
the owner a contractual limitation on the design professional's liability. A limitation of liability clause, unlike a disclaimer or waiver, does
not release the architect or engineer from any liability to the owner, but instead
apportions the potential liability between the parties. Once strongly disfavored by the
courts, the recent trend is for the courts to uphold limitation of liability clauses for
design professionals if the owner is of equal or greater sophistication and the limitation
is bargained for between the parties.
Elements of a Limitation of Liability Clause
A typical limitation of liability clause contains four main elements: (1) the party who is
benefiting from the limitation of its liability; (2) the party agreeing to limit its own
recovery for someone else's negligence; (3) the type of claims to which the limitation
applies; and (4) the amount of the limitation.
1. Party Receiving the Benefit of the Limitation
Illustration: "Design Professional and
its consultants, partners, agents and employees shall not be liable..."
In this case, obviously it is the design professional and its
consultants who are receiving a benefit by the owner's agreement to limit its recovery.
2. Party Agreeing to Limit its Recovery
Illustration: "Neither the Design
Professional ... shall be liable to the Owner ..."
It is important to note that a limitation of liability clause
does not reduce the liability of the design professional to third parties (such as injured
workers) who are not a party to the owner/design professional agreement. Rather, it
reduces the liability for claims by the owner against the design professional.
3. The Claims or Liabilities to Which the Limitation Applies
Illustration: "...for any and all
claims, losses, expenses, injuries, or damages arising out of or any way related to this
Project or this Agreement by reason or any act or omission, including breach of contract
or negligence not amounting to a willful or intentional wrong..."
Whereas an indemnity provision under the laws of most states
prevents a design professional from obtaining an indemnification against claims arising
from its own negligence, a limitation of liability clause covers any direct claims by the
owner against the design professional based upon the negligence of the design
professional.
4. The Amount of the Limitation
Illustration 1: "...shall not exceed
the total compensation received by Design Professional under this Agreement..."
Illustration 2: "...shall not exceed the total amount of
$_________."
Illustraion 3: "...shall not exceed the total sum paid on behalf of
or to the Design Professional by its insurers in settlement or satisfaction of Owner's
claims under the Terms and Conditions of the Design Professional's insurance policies
applicable thereto ..."
Illustration 4: "...shall not exceed the total compensation received
by Design Professionals under this Agreement, or the sum of $_________, whichever is
greater ..."
Limitation of liability clauses typically limit the design
professional's liability to one of the following: (i) the design professional's
compensation under the Agreement; (ii) a stipulated sum of money; (iii) available
insurance coverage; or (iv) a combination of two or more of the above.
5. Limitation of Consequential Damages
Illustration: "...shall not be liable
to the Owner for any special or consequential damages, including but not limited to, lost
profits, loss of use, and costs of replacement, caused by the Design Professional's
negligence, breach of contract, or any other cause whatsoever ..."
Another form of limitation which the design professional may
be able to negotiate successfully is an exclusion of any recovery by the owner of
consequential or special damages. For example, the design professional may be concerned on
a particular project about damages associated with lost profits or revenue, or loss of
use, if the completion of construction is delayed.
Enforceability of a Limitation of Liability Clause
In general, the law permits parties possessing relatively equal bargaining power to elect
to limit the liability of one party to other. Several courts have ruled that a design
professional may limit its liability to the owner provided that:
- The limitation clause has been freely negotiated by parties
with relatively equal bargaining power;
- The limitation clause is conspicuous and clearly set forth in
the agreement; and
- There exists no public policy prohibiting the enforcement of
the limitation of liability provision.
It should be recognized that state courts will have to decide
as cases arise whether there exists "public policy" considerations prohibiting
the enforcement of a design professional's limitations of liability. The following courts
recently have addressed the validity of limitation provisions on a design professional's
liability and found there to be no "public policy" prohibiting the enforcement
of such provisions (the Illinois courts have not yet rendered a decision on this issue):
Gibbs, Inc., II v. Law Engineering, Inc., (4th Cir. 1992);
Georgetown Steel Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp., 1992 Dist. Lexis 017669 (D.S. Car. 1992);
Markborough California, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Riverside County, 227 Cal.App.3d 705
(Calif. 1991). Nonetheless, because the validity of limitation of liability clauses has
not been decided in many states, it is important to recognize that even a carefully
drafted clause has no guarantee of surviving judicial scrutiny.
How to Draft an Enforceable Limitation Clause
The key to the design professional's drafting of an enforceable limitation of liability
clause is the recognition that the clause will be closely scrutinized by the courts if a
dispute arises and all doubts will be resolved against the design professional seeking to
enforce the limitation.
Therefore, it is necessary to make certain that the clause clearly and unambiguously
expresses the parties' intent in limiting the design professional's liability. In
addition, the clause should be set in bold face print, italicized, or placed apart from
the rest of the text on the page on which it appears so that the owner is aware of its
existence.
Because the parties must have the opportunity to negotiate a limitation of liability
clause for it to be enforced, it is helpful to maintain records of drafts of the agreement
and correspondence relating to the negotiation of the limitation.
How to Negotiate a Limitation of Liability Clause
From the design professional's vantage point, every owner/architect or owner/engineer
agreement would contain a limitation of liability clause if the owner would consent to
sharing the potential liability for faulty design work on a project. Unfortunately, the
world the design professional faces is a far crueler place. There are, however, a
number of strategies that can be employed to convince an owner that if a limitation of
liability clause is not in the owner's best interest, at least it is fair.
First, it is a fact of life that the owner and not the design professional receives most
of the long term financial benefit for a successful project, whereas the design
professional receives a one time fee which is often disproportionately small in relation
to the potential risk he/she has assumed. If the owner is made aware of the discrepancy
between the risk and the reward for the design professional, the owner may be willing to
limit the design professional's liability to the design professional's available insurance
coverage or a specific dollar amount. This is particularly so in design/engineering
projects where the potential liabilities typically can bankrupt a firm. Such is the case
with certain environmental remediation projects.
Second, the design professional can argue that he/she has purchased E&O coverage to
protect the owner against any faulty design, and if the insurance is not sufficient to pay
all liabilities, the damages would have to be catastrophic, in which event the design
professional's firm will not possibly be able to cover such losses. In other words, the
owner realistically does not look beyond the insurance of the design professional except
in circumstances where the design professional could not pay for catastrophic losses.
Telling an owner that you are unwilling to "bet your company" for a $50,000 fee
may persuade the owner to share a portion of the risk by limiting his recovery to
available insurance coverage. Moreover, the design professional can argue that the
limitation of liability does not give the design professional free rein to act carelessly
because he/she remains liable, rather the extent of such liability is limited to an amount
consistent with the financial reward for proper performance of the work.
Third, the design professional can offer the owner an option if the owner appears
unwilling to provide a limitation as to its recovery: "either provide a limitation of
liability or pay the design professional an additional fee to assume the full risk of any
liabilities on the project relating to its design." This approach has been upheld as
valid by the courts and, in addition to creating an option for the owner, may provide
evidence that the limitation of liability was freely negotiated if a dispute later arises.
Limitation of Liability
(To The Amount of Fee or Stipulated Sum)
The Design Professional, and its consultants, partners, agents and employees, shall not be
liable to the Owner, whether jointly, severally or individually, in excess of the
compensation paid to the Design Professional under this Agreement, or in excess of the sum
of $_______, whichever is greater, as a result of any act or omission not amounting to a
willful or intentional wrong.
Limitation of Design Professional's Liability
(Limited to Available Insurance or Specified Sum)
Design Professional shall procure and maintain insurance polices with such coverages and
in such amountts and for such period of time as required by and set forth in this
Agreement. Owner hereby agrees that to the fullest extent permitted by law Design
Professional's total liability to Owner for any and all injuries, claims losses, expenses
or damages whatsoever arising out of or in any way related to the project or this
Agreement from any cause or causes including but not limited to Design Professional's
negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, breach of contract or breach of warranty
(hereafter "Owner's claims") shall not exceed the total sum paid on behalf of or
to Design Professional by Design Professional's insurers in settlement or satisfaction of
Owner's claims under the terms and conditions of Design Professional's insurance policies
applicable thereto. If no such insurance coverage is provided with respect to Owner's
claims, then Design Professional's total liability to Owner for any and all such uninsured
Owner's claims shall not exceed $________.
Limitation of Design Professional's Liability
(Limited to Dollar Amount)
Owner hereby agrees that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Design Professional's
total liability to Owner for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses or damages
whatsoever arising out of or in any way related to the project or this Agreement from any
cause or causes including but not limited to Design Professional's negligence, errors,
omissions, strict liability, breach of contract or breach of warranty shall not exceed the
total amount of $________.
Limitation of Libility for Consequential and certain Other Damages
(Consequential Damages Limitation)
Owner hereby agrees that to the fullest extent permitted by law, Design Professional shall
not be liable to Owner for any special, indirect or consequential damages whatsoever,
whether caused by Design Professional's negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability,
breach of contract, breach of warranty or other cause or causes whatsoever, including but
not limited to, loss of use of equipment or facility, and loss of profits or revenue.
Attribution
Stephen G.M. Stein, Esq. and Marc E. Odier, Esq. Stein, Ray & Conway ("SRC")
is one of the largest firms in the United States exclusively devoted to contruction law.
SRC represents many of the country's largest owners, design professionals and contractors
in contract formation, risk management and insurance, business counseling, and dispute
resolution. SRC has handled some of the country's highest profile design and construction
cases.
The information in this and all other RISK Administration and Management Company
articles is intended for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
For legal advice and assistance, please contact competent counsel in the jurisdiction of
your professional practice.
The RISK Resource
Library
|